Recent posts

  • Death for fatherland (Republican bloodthirst #1)
    The end of January, with the anniversaries of the most famous royal executions in Europe (21 of January, 1793: Louis XVI in France, 30 of January, 1649: Charles I in England), provoked me to thinking about the role of death and bloodshed in the history of European republicanism. Look, for example, at ‘liberty or death’, […]
  • Dutch prophets of reason (interest) of state
    Different historical periods have different ranges of acceptable political brutality and different forms of hypocrisy. In this posting we will concern ourselves with two Dutch thinkers active at the edge of the 16th and 17th centuries — Lipsius and Grotius — and their adventures in writing on the amoral interest of power, at the age […]
  • Rustics and pencil-pushers, or how being determines consciousness
    What if the beliefs of people are determined by their lifestyle? A thesis that may sound commonsensical to some. Others would be quick to sniff out Marxism. For some time, I have been wondering if it may be the way to explain the differences in views between various political writers in the pre-partitions Commonwealth. It […]
  • Ukraine, imagination and hard filters
    Today, I want to write about imagining places from afar – or at least, as an outsider. We’ll look at an American author with his essay of Ukrainian-themed pandemic wisdom, an angry Polish commenter taking (lots of) issue and some of the earliest history of Ukrainian national consciousness. The main observation is that historical and […]
  • Modrevius, the political personalist
    For the Jagiellon era, and the Sigismundus Augustus’s reign specifically, Modrevius (Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski) is the Polish thinker that people tend to think of. Sadly, this brings with it lots of expectations. Modrzewski is forced to represent everything what is thought to be of worth in the intellectual atmosphere of Poland’s Golden Age and to […]
  • Why Sarmatian and Anglophone Republicans Disliked Each Other?
    Thus one could expect that there would be some visible, mutual acknowledgment of both Anglosaxon and “Sarmatian” (Polish-Lithuanian) republican thought. Instead, the countries mostly ignored each other and regarded each other’s liberty as more of a joke than a real thing.
  • The Player (Fredro #1)
    We will begin by sharing some social tactics from our today’s author: Sometimes, neglect talking to your friend somewhat, by letters or in person; let him fear that he can be forgotten or insulted by you. But shortly thereafter you should receive him with friendliness, so he will not get used to living without you. […]
  • The Karwicki’s Reckoning and a New Method of Elections (Karwicki #1)
    Stanisław Dunin Karwicki (ca. 1640-1724, read like kahrveetzky) is interesting for a number of reasons. First, he’s more of a regular guy, so to say, not holding any major local or central office for most of his life. Yet, he was elected an envoy from Sandomierz voivodship twelve times (1668, 1669, two times in 1674, […]
  • The Political Landscape in 1598 (Peyton #2)
    The length of this posting turned out to be a little gross. It includes a cursory description of religious composition, social structure and political system of the Republic of Both Nations. Once again our guide is John Peyton, an English spy and author of Relation of the State of Polonia and the Provinces United with […]